Collectives™ on Stack Overflow
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Learn more about Collectives
Teams
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Learn more about Teams
Update 2021-09
For versions 8 through 16, Oracle required a fee if their own
Oracle JDK
product was used in production, but not for dev, test, and training usages.
For Java 17, the
Oracle JDK
product is available under a new
No-Fee Terms and Conditions
license,
discussed on the Oracle
company blog
.
On my first reading, it appears this new license makes production use free-of-cost (along with dev, test, and training usages),
except for products sold for a fee while bundling the Oracle JDK
product. But I am not an attorney, so read the terms yourself and consult legal advice as needed.
Keep in mind that many other vendors continue to provide implementations of the Java specs, as shown in the flowchart below. Some of these vendors sell support plans, either optionally or as a requirement for use of their product. Never assume, always read the detailed requirements for any distribution you obtain.
Another 2021 update: Add Microsoft to the list of vendors seen below.
Java specification versus implementation
Java is defined by a
set of specifications
,
JSRs
, and
JEPs
, all published by Oracle.
Those specifications are implemented in the source code found at the
OpenJDK
project.
Several vendors provide builds of that source code. Some charge money for those builds and some do not.
Azul Systems
is one such vendor, a company providing multiple implementations.
Zulu Community
is one, provided free of charge.
Zulu Enterprise
is another of their products, a commercial offering.
Zing
is yet another product of theirs, a JVM/JDK for special needs.
You asked:
Is there any practical difference between Azul OpenJDK, Zulu OpenJDK and OpenJDK?
Yes and no.
Firstly,
OpenJDK provides only
source code
. So you cannot use OpenJDK to run Java apps. You must first build the OpenJDK source code yourself to get
executables
for your particular host platform, or you must rely on a vendor make a build for you. As seen in the flow chart below, there are several such vendors making builds of the OpenJDK source code.
As for products from Azul Systems, there is no such thing as
Azul OpenJDK
nor
Zulu OpenJDK
that I know of. Azul offers multiple products, as discussed above, but none of them by that name.
The
Zulu
name is used for 3 products, the
Community
and
Enterprise
editions above, plus
Zulu Embedded
for running on constrained hardware resources. As explained on their web site, all three of these are builds of the source code from OpenJDK.
So, no, basically no practical differences, as they all are builds of OpenJDK, and behave similar to most any other build of OpenJDK source code. Any desktop, server, or console application written to comply with the Java specifications will run on
Zulu Community
and
Zulu Enterprise
.
But, yes, there are some differences in that Azul adds some features such as having back-ported Flight Recorder and Mission Control to their Java 8 version of Zulu products. And Azul, like any such JDK provider, reserves the right to add a patch when urgently needed to fix a critical bug or security vulnerability without waiting for a release in the OpenJDK codebase.
And, yes, there are major differences with the
Zing
product by Azul as that is intended for special needs such as supporting very large amounts of memory. While I presume this product uses parts of OpenJDK, Zing performs quite differently to meet those special needs while still conforming with the Java specifications to be able to run any application written in Java.
Another practical difference is that you can obtain support services from Azul Systems for their builds. Several of the vendors provide support services for their builds. OpenJDK provides only source code, no support.
Lastly, I should mention that Azul Systems is
one of the sponsors
of
AdoptOpenJDK
, a project to provide (a) builds of OpenJDK, and (b)
test suites for quality assurance
.
If you have specific product questions, you should study the Azul.com web site, and contact the sales department at Azul Systems. I speak only for myself here, unaffiliated with that company. I have on occasion used their
Zulu Community
product, but not the others.
➥ Read
Java is Still Free
to understand the ecosystem of Oracle, OpenJDK, and the various vendors of Java implementations.
Here is a flow chart I made to help guide you in choosing a vendor for an implementation of Java 11.
–
–
–
Let's start with full disclosure, I work for Azul (which I think makes me qualified to answer the question).
OpenJDK is a "...place to collaborate on an open-source implementation of the Java Platform, Standard Edition, and related projects". Primarily, it hosts the source code repositories for the versions of Java since JDK 6. Sun open-sourced their implementation of JDK 7 in 2007, which was how OpenJDK originated. Subsequently, a project was created for JDK 6 (which oddly, is based on JDK 7). Each version since then has been developed through the OpenJDK.
Azul is a company that specialises in Java and JVM products.
Zulu is the name chosen for the binary distribution of the OpenJDK provided by Azul. This comes in three versions:
Zulu Community: The free distribution provided under the GPLv2 with classpath exception (CPE) license.
Zulu Enterprise: A commercially supported binary distribution with SLAs for how quickly updates will be made available after Oracle provide theirs, two versions of each update (CPU and PSU) and phone/e-mail bug reporting/resolution.
Zulu Embedded: Porting and support for specific chipsets and hardware configurations for embedded applications. Also, a commercial product, although free ARM 32 builds are available for Zulu Community.
To summarise, OpenJDK is the source code, Azul is the company and Zulu is the binary distribution built from OpenJDK.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
-
Please be sure to
answer the question
. Provide details and share your research!
But
avoid
…
-
Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
-
Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our
tips on writing great answers
.
