logging - Which takes priority: logback.xml or logback-test.xml?

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Learn more about Collectives

Teams

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Learn more about Teams


    logback.xml

: present under *src/main/resources/


    logback-test.xml

: present under *src/test/resources/

Which one will load? logback.xml or logback-test.xml ?

I was reading the documentation of logback and it says, first it looks for logback-test.xml and then logback.xml .

So is it like logback-test.xml file will take a priority over logback.xml if we deploy the application?

Thanks!

Saurabh

From the docs :

Let us begin by discussing the initialization steps that logback follows to try to configure itself:

Logback tries to find a file called logback-test.xml in the classpath.

If no such file is found, logback tries to find a file called logback.groovy in the classpath.

If no such file is found, it checks for the file logback.xml in the classpath..

If no such file is found, service-provider loading facility (introduced in JDK 1.6) is used to resolve the implementation of com.qos.logback.classic.spi.Configurator interface by looking up the file META-INF\services\ch.qos.logback.classic.spi.Configurator in the class path. Its contents should specify the fully qualified class name of the desired Configurator implementation.

If none of the above succeeds, logback configures itself automatically using the BasicConfigurator which will cause logging output to be directed to the console.

The last step is meant as last-ditch effort to provide a default (but very basic) logging functionality in the absence of a configuration file.

So, the answer to this question ...

Which takes priority: logback.xml or logback-test.xml?

... is logback-test.xml .

However, this question ...

So is it like logback-test.xml file will take a priority over logback.xml if we deploy the application?

... slightly complicates matters. If you deploy both logback-test.xml and logback.xml then logback-test.xml wil take priority but it is not common to deploy logback-test.xml . Indeed, given the locations supplied in your question logback-test.xml will not, by default, be deployed since it is in the test tree ( src/test/resources ).

Again, from the docs :

If you are using Maven and if you place the logback-test.xml under the src/test/resources folder, Maven will ensure that it won't be included in the artifact produced. Thus, you can use a different configuration file, namely logback-test.xml during testing, and another file, namely, logback.xml, in production.

So, in summary; by default logback-test.xml will not be deployed so logback.xml will be used in your deployed system but logback-test.xml will take priority over logback.xml when running your test cases.

@glytching: My logback-text.xml is not able to pick up the application.yml entries from src/test/resources. Any idea why? The entries are as below. These entries are being fetched from application.yml in test/resources. But getting UNDEFINED. Am I reading the right classpath <property resource="application-default.yml" /> <springProperty scope="context" name="max_log_file_size" source="max_log_size" /> <springProperty scope="context" name="base_log_path" source="base_log" /> – raikumardipak Sep 3, 2020 at 13:03

Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

Please be sure to answer the question . Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers .