Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Learn more about Collectives

Teams

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Learn more about Teams

I setup global namespaces for my objects by explicitly setting a property on window .

window.MyNamespace = window.MyNamespace || {};

TypeScript underlines MyNamespace and complains that:

The property 'MyNamespace' does not exist on value of type 'window'

I can make the code work by declaring MyNamespace as an ambient variable and dropping the window explicitness but I don't want to do that.

declare var MyNamespace: any;
MyNamespace = MyNamespace || {};

How can I keep window in there and make TypeScript happy?

As a side note I find it especially funny that TypeScript complains since it tells me that window is of type any which by definitely can contain anything.

I just found the answer to this in another Stack Overflow question's answer.

declare global {
    interface Window { MyNamespace: any; }
window.MyNamespace = window.MyNamespace || {};

Basically, you need to extend the existing window interface to tell it about your new property.

I couldn't get this to compile with tsc 1.0.1.0. Blake Mitchell's answer did work for me, though. – Pat Oct 13, 2014 at 17:51 The declare global { interface Window { ... } } works with TypeScript 2.5.2, no need for .d.ts file as mentioned above – tanguy_k Sep 3, 2017 at 20:29 if you get the error "TS2339: Property 'MyNamespace' does not exist on type 'Window & typeof globalThis'." then add export {} at the beginning of the file. – Mahdi Abdi Jun 23, 2020 at 7:47 @martin: The <any> makes it explicit, so it works just fine, I believe. Others: If you are using Typescript with React or other JSX environment (resulting in TSX syntax) you'll have to use as instead of <>. See @david-boyd's answer below. – Don Aug 22, 2017 at 15:59 I believe taking this approach doesn't work well with the spirit of TypeScript. When I write my projects in TS, I'm trying to improve my ability to spot errors before the user does. This approach merely silences the type checker, but doesn't ensure correct usage of the member which is being defined. – Tess E. Duursma Oct 13, 2022 at 10:32 It is the same except when using TSX, because the <any> gets interpreted as JSX, not a type cast. – Jake Boone May 15, 2017 at 20:40 Thanks @David, this worked like a charm with new Create React App and typescript version, Previously this was working : (<any>window).MyNamespace, but now it is breaking in new typescript version 3.5.x. – Jignesh Raval Jul 9, 2019 at 15:58 Funny how people use Typescript and then silence it. It's as good as not using it at all. And to think that these answers are the most upvoted ones! Sounds promising... – jperl Oct 6, 2021 at 8:41 Does not work in ^3.4.3. TypeScript error: Element implicitly has an 'any' type because type 'Window' has no index signature. TS7017 – Green Apr 16, 2019 at 12:04 I really must echo @Auspex. TypeScript isn't a thing you should be trying to get around. If you're using TS, embrace it and get the types right. If you don't want to do that, don't use TypeScript. If you're being forced to use it but don't want to, make the case to your manager to switch away from TS, or get help getting the typings right. It's exceedingly unprofessional and petulant to muddy and disrupt a TS codebase as a passive aggressive swipe at strong/static typing. – Patrick Sep 12, 2019 at 15:53

Globals are "evil" :) I think the best way to also have the portability is:

First you export the interface: (for example, ./custom.window.ts)

export interface CustomWindow extends Window {
    customAttribute: any;

Second, you import

import {CustomWindow} from './custom.window.ts';

Third, cast the global variable window with CustomWindow:

declare let window: CustomWindow;

In this way you also don't have a red line in a different IDE if you use it with existent attributes of the window object, so at the end try:

window.customAttribute = 'works';
window.location.href = '/works';

Tested with TypeScript 2.4.x and newest!

you might want to expand on why globals are evil. In our case we're using a non standardized API on the window object. It is polyfilled for now. Is that truely evil? – Mathijs Segers Nov 7, 2018 at 8:01 @MathijsSegers i don't know especially your case but.. about globals are evil is not only about javascript.. is in every language.. some reason are: - You can't apply well design pattern - Memory and performance issue (You have them everywhere, try to attach something to String Object and see what happens when you do new String) - Name collision causing side effect on code.. (especially on javascript that have async nature) I can continue but i think you can image the rest... – onalbi Nov 7, 2018 at 21:14 @onabi I'm literally talking about a feature of the browser. It's globally available since it's the browser. You really would suggest it's still wrong to go for global definitions? I mean we could implement Ponyfills but this would bloat browsers which actually support the feature (e.g. fullscreen api). That said I don't believe that all globals are evil perse. – Mathijs Segers Nov 8, 2018 at 6:54 @MathijsSegers in my opinion the global variable should be avoid to be used or modified where we can.. is true that window is available since browser exist but is also true that was in mutation all the time.. so if for example we define now window.feature = 'Feature'; and this is used in massive way on code.. what happen if window.feature is added by browsers on all code this feature is override.. anyway i gave a explanation of my sentence is not to go against you.. regards... – onalbi Nov 8, 2018 at 9:10 Globals are not "evil"; there is a place for such things, otherwise they would be removed from programming languages. Sometimes a global variable really is the best way to implement something. What is evil, is "overuse of globals". – deltamind106 Feb 12, 2021 at 20:55

For those using the Angular CLI, it's straightforward:

File src/polyfills.ts

declare global {
  interface Window {
    myCustomFn: () => void;

File my-custom-utils.ts

window.myCustomFn = function () {

If you're using IntelliJ IDEA, you also needed to change the following setting in the IDE before your new polyfills pick up:

> Settings > Languages & Frameworks > TypeScript > check 'Use TypeScript Service'.

The accepted answer is what I used to use, but with TypeScript 0.9.* it no longer works. The new definition of the Window interface seems to completely replace the built-in definition, instead of augmenting it.

I have taken to doing this instead:

interface MyWindow extends Window {
    myFunction(): void;
declare var window: MyWindow;

UPDATE: With TypeScript 0.9.5 the accepted answer is working again.

This works also with modules as used by TypeScript 2.0.8. Example: export default class MyClass{ foo(){ ... } ... } interface MyWindow extends Window{ mc: MyClass } declare var window: MyWindow window.mc = new MyClass() Then you can call foo() e.g. from the Chrome Dev Tools console like mc.foo() – Martin Majewski Dec 5, 2016 at 16:43 This is a very nice answer if you don't want to declare something as global. On the other side, you need to call declare var... in every file you need. – Puce May 25, 2018 at 12:23 Plus one for this approach because in this case you don't conflict with the other packages which extend the global window in the monorepo. – Dmitrii Sorin Oct 4, 2018 at 6:55 Thank you! Best answer IMO. One should not override Window for the simple fact that it is not a vanilla window. Just circumventing type checking or trying to fool TS also isn't the way to do it. – Rutger Willems Sep 18, 2019 at 11:13

If you need to extend the window object with a custom type that requires the use of import, you can use the following method:

window.d.ts

import MyInterface from './MyInterface';
declare global {
    interface Window {
        propName: MyInterface

See Global Augmentation in the 'Declaration Merging' section of the Handbook.

Create a file called global.d.ts, e.g., /src/@types/global.d.ts, and then define an interface like:

interface Window {
  myLib: any

Reference: Global .d.ts

Most of the other answers are not perfect.

  • Some of them just suppress the type inference for show.
  • Some of the others only care about global variables as namespaces, but not as interfaces/classes
  • I also encountered a similar problem this morning. I tried so many "solutions" on Stack Overflow, but none of them produced absolutely no type errors and enabled triggering type jumping in the IDE (WebStorm or Visual Studio Code).

    Finally, from Allow module definitions to be declared as global variables #3180

    I found a reasonable solution to attach typings for a global variable that acts as interface/class and namespace both.

    The example is below:

    // typings.d.ts
    declare interface Window {
        myNamespace?: MyNamespace & typeof MyNamespace
    declare interface MyNamespace {
        somemethod?()
    declare namespace MyNamespace {
        // ...
    

    The code above merges the typings of namespace MyNamespace and interface MyNamespace into the global variable myNamespace (the property of window).

    I don't need to do this very often. The only case I have had was when using Redux DevTools with middleware.

    I simply did:

    const composeEnhancers = (window as any).__REDUX_DEVTOOLS_EXTENSION_COMPOSE__ || compose;
    

    Or you could do:

    let myWindow = window as any;

    And then myWindow.myProp = 'my value';

    In this case you can also install the npm package, which contains all the definitions - as specified in the docs – bbrinx Jan 30, 2019 at 21:48 Thanks to this, I could enable redux tools properly under typescript by using (window as any).__REDUX_DEVTOOLS_EXTENSION__ && (window as any).__REDUX_DEVTOOLS_EXTENSION__()) – danivicario May 5, 2019 at 11:25

    From the version 3.4, TypeScript has supported globalThis. See Type-checking for globalThis.

    From the above link:

    // in a global file:
    var abc = 100;
    // Refers to 'abc' from above.
    globalThis.abc = 200;
    window.abc = 300; // window object can also be used.
    

    Playground

    A "global" file is a file which does not have any import/export statements. So the declaration var abc; can be written in .d.ts.

    Yes but does it declare the variable on the window object, which is the question asked? I highly doubt that – Tofandel Jul 12, 2021 at 16:57 It does. lib.d.ts declares window as type Windows & globalThis, meaning the two types get merged together. – David Wheatley Jul 29, 2021 at 16:44

    After finding answers around, I think this page might be helpful:

    Global augmentation

    I am not sure about the history of declaration merging, but it explains why the following could work.

    declare global {
        interface Window { MyNamespace: any; }
    window.MyNamespace = window.MyNamespace || {};
    

    Using create-react-app v3.3 I found the easiest way to achieve this was to extend the Window type in the auto-generated react-app-env.d.ts:

    interface Window {
        MyNamespace: any;
    

    TypeScript does not perform typechecking on string properties.

    window["newProperty"] = customObj;
    

    Ideally, the global variable scenario should be avoided. I use it sometimes to debug an object in the browser console.

    window["MyNamespace"] = window["MyNamespace"] || {};
    

    should be all right as it is using a string property, but if you really want to have a separated window and organised your code, you can extend the window object:

    interface MyNamespacedWindow extends Window {
        MyNamespace: object;
    declare var window: MyNamespacedWindow;
                    I like your second solution, but it throws a TS error on declare saying Modifiers cannot appear here. ts(1184). Any ideas?
    – TinyTiger
                    Feb 5, 2022 at 23:38
    

    If you are using TypeScript 3.x, you may be able to omit the declare global part in the other answers and instead just use:

    interface Window {
      someValue: string
      another: boolean
    

    This worked with me when using TypeScript 3.3, Webpack and TSLint.

    "TSLint has been deprecated as of 2019. Please see this issue for more details: Roadmap: TSLint → ESLint.". Source. – Peter Mortensen Nov 6, 2021 at 22:05

    Here's how to do it, if you're using TypeScript Definition Manager!

    npm install typings --global
    

    Create typings/custom/window.d.ts:

    interface Window {
      MyNamespace: any;
    declare var window: Window;
    

    Install your custom typing:

    typings install file:typings/custom/window.d.ts --save --global
    

    Done! Use it! TypeScript won't complain any more:

    window.MyNamespace = window.MyNamespace || {};
                    FWIW typings was made obsolete with Typescript 2.0 (mid 2016), and has been archived by the owner.
    – mrm
                    Dec 11, 2018 at 2:52
                    This worked nicely for me and feels an explicit way of defining the type globally where that's applicable. I'll add that in my case I wanted to add Cypress and app which had imported types. I was able to nicely achieve this by importing both types from their respective libs and declaring the attributes accordingly:  ``` import { Cypress } from 'cypress'; import { ComponentPublicInstance } from 'vue';  // Add Cypress and app to global window for testing export declare global {   interface Window {     Cypress: Cypress;     app: ComponentPublicInstance;   } } ```
    – aleph_one
                    May 23, 2022 at 20:32
    

    First you need to declare the window object in the current scope. Because TypeScript would like to know the type of the object. Since the window object is defined somewhere else, you can not redefine it.

    But you can declare it as follows:

    declare var window: any;
    

    This will not redefine the window object nor will it create another variable with name window. This means window is defined somewhere else and you are just referencing it in the current scope.

    Then you can refer to your MyNamespace object simply by:

    window.MyNamespace
    

    Or you can set the new property on the window object simply by:

    window.MyNamespace = MyObject
    

    And now the TypeScript won’t complain.

    For reference (this is the correct answer):

    Inside a .d.ts definition file

    type MyGlobalFunctionType = (name: string) => void
    

    If you work in the browser, you add members to the browser's window context by reopening Window's interface:

    interface Window {
      myGlobalFunction: MyGlobalFunctionType
    

    The same idea for Node.js:

    declare module NodeJS {
      interface Global {
        myGlobalFunction: MyGlobalFunctionType
    

    Now you declare the root variable (that will actually live on window or global):

    declare const myGlobalFunction: MyGlobalFunctionType;
    

    Then in a regular .ts file, but imported as side-effect, you actually implement it:

    global/* or window */.myGlobalFunction = function (name: string) {
      console.log("Hey !", name);
    

    And finally use it elsewhere in the codebase, with either:

    global/* or window */.myGlobalFunction("Kevin");
    myGlobalFunction("Kevin");
    

    [2022]:We have to extend the "window" object in our React or Nextjs project . We can use the following step to solve this issue.

  • Make a folder inside src folder name as types.

  • Make a file inside types folder name as index.d.ts

  • write this code inside index.d.ts file.

    export {};
     declare global {
       interface Window {
        NameSpace: any;
     window.NameSpace= window.NameSpace|| {};
    save this file.

    Now one last change .

    Change the "tsConfig.json" file. to inherit both the node module type and our types.

    "compilerOptions": { "typeRoots": [ "./node_modules/@types", "./src/types"

    Make a custom interface that extends the Window and add your custom property as optional.

    Then, let the customWindow use the custom interface, but valued with the original window.

    It's worked with the TypeScript 3.1.3.

    interface ICustomWindow extends Window {
      MyNamespace?: any
    const customWindow:ICustomWindow = window;
    customWindow.MyNamespace = customWindow.MyNamespace {}
    

    For those who want to set a computed or dynamic property on the window object, you'll find that not possible with the declare global method. To clarify for this use case

    window[DynamicObject.key] // Element implicitly has an 'any' type because type Window has no index signature
    

    You might attempt to do something like this

    declare global {
      interface Window {
        [DyanmicObject.key]: string; // error RIP
    

    The above will error though. This is because in TypeScript, interfaces do not play well with computed properties and will throw an error like

    A computed property name in an interface must directly refer to a built-in symbol
    

    To get around this, you can go with the suggest of casting window to <any> so you can do

    (window as any)[DynamicObject.key]
    

    I wanted to use this in an Angular (6) library today and it took me a while to get this to work as expected.

    In order for my library to use declarations, I had to use the d.ts extension for the file that declares the new properties of the global object.

    So in the end, the file ended up with something like:

    /path-to-angular-workspace/angular-workspace/projects/angular-library/src/globals.d.ts

    Once created, don't forget to expose it in your public_api.ts.

    That did it for me.

    TypeScript prevents accessing an object without assigning a type that has the desired property or already assigned to any, so you can use optional chaining:

    window?.MyNamespace =  'value'
    

    I know that question may be too old for new answers, but I recently did that with a method that wasn't mentioned here - Object.defineProperty(). Like this:

    Object.defineProperty(window, 'MyNamespace', {
      enumerable: true,
      configurable: true,
      value: MyNamespace || {}
            

    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

    But avoid

    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

  •