Google’s payments to influence state government surged to almost $11 million from July through September, nearly 90 times more than the same period last year, making it the highest-spending lobbyist employer in California in the third quarter.
Its lobbying blitz came as the tech giant engaged in a fierce battle at the state Capitol during the final months of the legislative session over whether it would have to pay news outlets for publishing their content.
Google’s lobbying expenses never previously topped $1.3 million in a single quarter,
according to state records
, and are typically far less. During the first two quarters of 2024, Google spent on average of about $261,000 on lobbying — 41 times less than its $10.7 million bombardment this summer.
The company did not respond to questions about its lobbying, which last quarter was ahead of
more typical titans of influence
in Sacramento, including the Western States Petroleum Association, the California Business Roundtable and the California Hospital Association.
During that period, which included the end of the legislative session in August and the governor’s bill signing period in September, Google reached the conclusion of a contentious two-year battle over journalism funding.
The search behemoth could have been on the hook for tens of millions of dollars or more annually under
Assembly Bill 886
, a proposal to require major tech platforms such as Google to either pay a fee or negotiate with California news outlets for using their work. Introduced by Assemblymember
Buffy Wicks
, an Oakland Democrat, the measure passed the Assembly last year before Wicks
shelved it to negotiate directly
with the industry.
Instead, in August, she
announced a deal
for Google to provide $55 million over the next five years for a new fund for local newsrooms and $70 million for an artificial intelligence accelerator. Under the deal, the state will also kick in $70 million over five years for the newsroom fund, while Google will continue $10 million in existing annual grants that the company had
threatened to pull
if the bill passed.
“That agreement was an escape clause for Google,” said state Sen.
Steve Glazer
, an Orinda Democrat who was
pursuing another proposal
, approved by the Senate in June, that he estimates would have raised $500 million a year for California news outlets by charging major tech platforms a mitigation fee.
Google had to ramp up its lobbying this summer to offset renewed momentum for the journalism funding bills and secure a deal with more favorable terms, said Glazer, who did not support the final agreement. “Their spending was a reflection of the cheaper alternative.”
The millions of dollars spent to push Google’s point of view was largely funneled through two other organizations, according to its
lobbying disclosure report
: The tech giant paid $7 million to the Computer and Communications Industry Association and $2.75 million to the California Taxpayers Association during the third quarter. The groups ran advertisements
on television
and
social
media
opposing the Wicks and Glazer bills.
Both organizations have previously lobbied state officials, but the summer payments from Google resulted in budgets hundreds of times greater than in the spring. Their spending in the third quarter was directed almost entirely to hiring Washington, D.C.-based advertising firms, according to their
disclosure
reports
.
Google’s record lobbying payments last quarter far exceeded other major tech companies that would have been forced to pay up under the Wicks and Glazer journalism funding proposals.
Amazon
spent more than $918,000
during the third quarter, its largest lobbying quarter on record and triple the amount in the same period last year. Meta, which
threatened to remove news posts
from its Facebook and Instagram platforms if it had to pay for them, spent nearly $366,000.
Google didn’t just pour money into persuading lawmakers. It also contributed a small fortune to the campaigns of 40 elected officials on a single day,
campaign finance disclosures
show. On Sept. 13, two weeks after the Legislature adjourned, the company cut checks totaling $107,500 to 39 legislators, including Wicks, plus Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis — more than a third of the $301,800 that Google contributed to state campaigns since last January.
Google’s financial disclosure for the third quarter mentions lobbying the Legislature on more than 30 bills, as well the governor’s office and several state agencies, without providing a breakdown of its spending.
Another priority this summer was
Senate Bill 1047
, which would have required testing large-scale AI models to determine whether they harm society. Big tech players, including Google, vocally opposed the regulation and it was ultimately
vetoed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September
.
But Sen.
Scott Wiener
, the San Francisco Democrat who carried the measure, said Google’s lobbying appeared to be more focused on the journalism funding legislation. While the company was a leading voice against his AI testing bill, he said, its efforts there seemed to be directed outside of the Capitol.
“It was not a tidal wave of activity,” Wiener said. “It was much more online and on social media.”
Alexei Koseff covers Gov. Gavin Newsom, the Legislature and California government from Sacramento. He joined CalMatters in January 2022 after previously reporting on the Capitol for The Sacramento Bee...
More by Alexei Koseff
Jeremia is a data journalist who uses code and data to make policy and politicians easier to understand. He was previously a graphics editor at the COVID Tracking Project and a data journalist at NBC News...
More by Jeremia Kimelman
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
Give prominent credit to our journalists:
Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (
example
) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
Credit CalMatters at the top of the story:
At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by
CalMatters
.
Sign up
for their newsletters.” If you are republishing
commentary
, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by
CalMatters
.
Sign up
for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at
republish@calmatters.org
if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at
republish@calmatters.org
.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
<h1>Why no one spent more than Google to lobby California officials this summer</h1>
<p>By <a href="https://calmatters.org/author/alexei-koseff/" title="Posts by Alexei Koseff" class="author url fn" rel="author">Alexei Koseff</a> and <a href="https://calmatters.org/author/jeremia-kimelman/" title="Posts by Jeremia Kimelman" class="author url fn" rel="author">Jeremia Kimelman</a>, CalMatters</p><p>This story was originally published by <a href="https://calmatters.org/">CalMatters</a>. <a href="https://calmatters.org/subscribe-to-calmatters/">Sign up</a> for their newsletters.</p>
<p><em>Lea esta historia en <a href="https://calmatters.org/calmatters-en-espanol/2024/11/google-gastos-inversiones-politicos-legislaciones-lobby-juicio-campanas/">Español</a></em></p>
<p>Google’s payments to influence state government surged to almost $11 million from July through September, nearly 90 times more than the same period last year, making it the highest-spending lobbyist employer in California in the third quarter.</p>
<p>Its lobbying blitz came as the tech giant engaged in a fierce battle at the state Capitol during the final months of the legislative session over whether it would have to pay news outlets for publishing their content.</p>
<p>Google’s lobbying expenses never previously topped $1.3 million in a single quarter, <a href="https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Lobbying/Employers/Detail.aspx?id=1265187&view=activity&session=2023">according to state records</a>, and are typically far less. During the first two quarters of 2024, Google spent on average of about $261,000 on lobbying — 41 times less than its $10.7 million bombardment this summer.</p>
<p>The company did not respond to questions about its lobbying, which last quarter was ahead of <a href="https://calmatters.org/politics/2024/05/california-lobbying-state-government-2/">more typical titans of influence</a> in Sacramento, including the Western States Petroleum Association, the California Business Roundtable and the California Hospital Association.</p>
<p>During that period, which included the end of the legislative session in August and the governor’s bill signing period in September, Google reached the conclusion of a contentious two-year battle over journalism funding.</p>
<p>The search behemoth could have been on the hook for tens of millions of dollars or more annually under <a href="https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202320240ab886?_gl=1*1s209yh*_gcl_au*MTIzNzQwMDQ3Mi4xNzMwMTQzMjg3*_ga*MTY0MDMyNjc0Ny4xNzIyMzYwNDI5*_ga_5TKXNLE5NK*MTczMTQzNDAzMy4yNTQuMS4xNzMxNDQxMDUwLjQ4LjAuMA..*_ga_DX0K9PCWYH*MTczMTQzNDAzMy4yNzYuMS4xNzMxNDQxMDQ4LjAuMC4w*_ga_GNY4L81DZE*MTczMTQ0MTAzOS4xNDMuMC4xNzMxNDQxMDM5LjAuMC4w">Assembly Bill 886</a>, a proposal to require major tech platforms such as Google to either pay a fee or negotiate with California news outlets for using their work. Introduced by Assemblymember <a href="https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/legislators/buffy-wicks-165044">Buffy Wicks</a>, an Oakland Democrat, the measure passed the Assembly last year before Wicks <a href="https://calmatters.org/newsletters/whatmatters/2023/07/california-parole-investigation/">shelved it to negotiate directly</a> with the industry.</p>
<p>Instead, in August, she <a href="https://calmatters.org/politics/capitol/2024/08/california-journalism-deal-legislature-google/">announced a deal</a> for Google to provide $55 million over the next five years for a new fund for local newsrooms and $70 million for an artificial intelligence accelerator. Under the deal, the state will also kick in $70 million over five years for the newsroom fund, while Google will continue $10 million in existing annual grants that the company had <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/05/21/google-news-initiative-journalism-funding-california">threatened to pull</a> if the bill passed.</p>
<p>“That agreement was an escape clause for Google,” said state Sen. <a href="https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/legislators/steven-glazer-165414">Steve Glazer</a>, an Orinda Democrat who was <a href="https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202320240sb1327">pursuing another proposal</a>, approved by the Senate in June, that he estimates would have raised $500 million a year for California news outlets by charging major tech platforms a mitigation fee.</p>
<div style="min-height:578px" id="datawrapper-vis-EoWES"><script type="text/javascript" defer src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/EoWES/embed.js" charset="utf-8" data-target="#datawrapper-vis-EoWES"></script><noscript><img src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/EoWES/full.png" alt="" /></noscript></div>
<p>Google had to ramp up its lobbying this summer to offset renewed momentum for the journalism funding bills and secure a deal with more favorable terms, said Glazer, who did not support the final agreement. “Their spending was a reflection of the cheaper alternative.”</p>
<p>Wicks, who did not respond to an interview request, has previously called the deal <a href="https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article291309020.html">the best of what was possible</a>.</p>
<p>The millions of dollars spent to push Google’s point of view was largely funneled through two other organizations, according to its <a href="https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/PDFGen/pdfgen.prg?filingid=2980152&amendid=0">lobbying disclosure report</a>: The tech giant paid $7 million to the Computer and Communications Industry Association and $2.75 million to the California Taxpayers Association during the third quarter. The groups ran advertisements <a href="https://www.abc10.com/article/news/politics/big-tech-political-ad-warns-that-local-news-under-siege/103-00f20a13-faf1-47ab-b5a2-c69a75c6cd38">on television</a> and <a href="https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?id=462521346758314">social</a> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?id=378002648657449">media</a> opposing the Wicks and Glazer bills.</p>
<p>Both organizations have previously lobbied state officials, but the summer payments from Google resulted in budgets hundreds of times greater than in the spring. Their spending in the third quarter was directed almost entirely to hiring Washington, D.C.-based advertising firms, according to their <a href="https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/PDFGen/pdfgen.prg?filingid=2970727&amendid=0">disclosure</a> <a href="https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/PDFGen/pdfgen.prg?filingid=2980962&amendid=0">reports</a>.</p>
<p>Google’s record lobbying payments last quarter far exceeded other major tech companies that would have been forced to pay up under the Wicks and Glazer journalism funding proposals.</p>
<p>Amazon <a href="https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Lobbying/Employers/Detail.aspx?id=1224147&view=activity&session=2023">spent more than $918,000</a> during the third quarter, its largest lobbying quarter on record and triple the amount in the same period last year. Meta, which <a href="https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article275952421.html">threatened to remove news posts</a> from its Facebook and Instagram platforms if it had to pay for them, spent nearly $366,000.</p>
<p>Google didn’t just pour money into persuading lawmakers. It also contributed a small fortune to the campaigns of 40 elected officials on a single day, <a href="https://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/PDFGen/pdfgen.prg?filingid=2980152&amendid=0">campaign finance disclosures</a> show. On Sept. 13, two weeks after the Legislature adjourned, the company cut checks totaling $107,500 to 39 legislators, including Wicks, plus Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis — more than a third of the $301,800 that Google contributed to state campaigns since last January.</p>
<div style="min-height:633px" id="datawrapper-vis-rQEvG"><script type="text/javascript" defer src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/rQEvG/embed.js" charset="utf-8" data-target="#datawrapper-vis-rQEvG"></script><noscript><img src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/rQEvG/full.png" alt="" /></noscript></div>
<p>Google’s financial disclosure for the third quarter mentions lobbying the Legislature on more than 30 bills, as well the governor’s office and several state agencies, without providing a breakdown of its spending.</p>
<p>Another priority this summer was <a href="https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202320240sb1047?_gl=1*1pzifhz*_gcl_au*MTIzNzQwMDQ3Mi4xNzMwMTQzMjg3*_ga*MTY0MDMyNjc0Ny4xNzIyMzYwNDI5*_ga_5TKXNLE5NK*MTczMTQ0OTEyMi4yNTUuMS4xNzMxNDUxNTYzLjYwLjAuMA..*_ga_DX0K9PCWYH*MTczMTQ0OTEyMi4yNzcuMS4xNzMxNDUxNTYzLjAuMC4w*_ga_GNY4L81DZE*MTczMTQ0OTEyMi4xNDQuMS4xNzMxNDUwOTgzLjAuMC4w">Senate Bill 1047</a>, which would have required testing large-scale AI models to determine whether they harm society. Big tech players, including Google, vocally opposed the regulation and it was ultimately <a href="https://calmatters.org/economy/2024/09/california-artificial-intelligence-bill-veto/">vetoed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September</a>. </p>
<p>But Sen. <a href="https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/legislators/scott-wiener-100936">Scott Wiener</a>, the San Francisco Democrat who carried the measure, said Google’s lobbying appeared to be more focused on the journalism funding legislation. While the company was a leading voice against his AI testing bill, he said, its efforts there seemed to be directed outside of the Capitol.</p>
<p>"It was not a tidal wave of activity," Wiener said. "It was much more online and on social media."</p>
<p>This article was <a href="https://calmatters.org/politics/capitol/2024/11/google-lobbying-california/">originally published on CalMatters</a> and was republished under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives</a> license.</p>
