囟门与说话早迟有关系？闭合过早会智力低下？崔玉涛来解答_网易订阅

相关文章推荐

含蓄的人字拖 · 杭州图书馆· 11 月前 ·

长情的跑步机 · 沈阳开始编制第五轮城市总体规划· 1 年前 ·

逃课的水龙头 · 广州一退休主任医师家中遭持刀伤害，嫌疑人坠亡 ...· 1 年前 ·

爱笑的日记本 · 在微流体装置中生成具有功能性神经肌肉接头的人 ...· 1 年前 ·

爱旅游的肉夹馍 · 特斯拉價格知多少？充電要錢？電動車入手前必注 ...· 2 年前 ·

Previous message (by thread): SMPlayer.net

Next message (by thread): Ignoring 'target specific option mismatch' on inline

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] The idea is to instantiate function templates with optimized SIMD routines multiple times, then I can compile all my code with -march=i386, and select the best implementation at runtime. However, after already spending a lot of time restructuring my code around this idea, I discover that gcc refuses to compile this without having the corresponding target options enabled: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '__m64 _mm_unpacklo_pi8(__m64, __m64)': target specific option mismatch That makes no sense to me. I want gcc to emit those SIMD instructions verbatim in my code, regardless of what compiler options the user specified. What then is the point of feature-test macros (__SSE__, etc)? I don't get it. Is there any option or attribute I can use to make gcc ignore these target option mismatches when inlining? Or any other way to make this work?

Previous message (by thread): SMPlayer.net

Next message (by thread): Ignoring 'target specific option mismatch' on inline

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

推荐文章

含蓄的人字拖 · 杭州图书馆

11 月前

长情的跑步机 · 沈阳开始编制第五轮城市总体规划

1 年前

逃课的水龙头 · 广州一退休主任医师家中遭持刀伤害，嫌疑人坠亡动机待查_直击现场_澎湃新闻-The Paper

1 年前

爱笑的日记本 · 在微流体装置中生成具有功能性神经肌肉接头的人类运动单元 (Scientific Article Protocol) | JoVE | Translated to Chinese

1 年前

爱旅游的肉夹馍 · 特斯拉價格知多少？充電要錢？電動車入手前必注意3事項！

2 年前