囟门与说话早迟有关系？闭合过早会智力低下？崔玉涛来解答_网易订阅

相关文章推荐

行走的消防车 · 保健用品類 - 中小企業減碳服務站 ...· 11 月前 ·

腹黑的脆皮肠 · 《关于开展温州市面向全球招引高校毕业生“51 ...· 11 月前 ·

挂过科的板栗 · 深圳外国语学校国际部SWIS-Pick ...· 11 月前 ·

文雅的小蝌蚪 · 我校伍楷舜教授当选2023年IEEE ...· 1 年前 ·

坚强的伤痕 · 特稿：新征程领路人习近平_深圳新闻网· 2 年前 ·

Previous message (by thread): SMPlayer.net

Next message (by thread): Ignoring 'target specific option mismatch' on inline

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] The idea is to instantiate function templates with optimized SIMD routines multiple times, then I can compile all my code with -march=i386, and select the best implementation at runtime. However, after already spending a lot of time restructuring my code around this idea, I discover that gcc refuses to compile this without having the corresponding target options enabled: error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' '__m64 _mm_unpacklo_pi8(__m64, __m64)': target specific option mismatch That makes no sense to me. I want gcc to emit those SIMD instructions verbatim in my code, regardless of what compiler options the user specified. What then is the point of feature-test macros (__SSE__, etc)? I don't get it. Is there any option or attribute I can use to make gcc ignore these target option mismatches when inlining? Or any other way to make this work?

Previous message (by thread): SMPlayer.net

Next message (by thread): Ignoring 'target specific option mismatch' on inline

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

推荐文章

行走的消防车 · 保健用品類 - 中小企業減碳服務站 [標竿學習] 建構睡眠呼吸器循環經濟模式（萊鎂醫療器材股份有限公司）

11 月前

腹黑的脆皮肠 · 《关于开展温州市面向全球招引高校毕业生“510+行动计划”的方案》的通知

11 月前

挂过科的板栗 · 深圳外国语学校国际部SWIS-Pick School

11 月前

文雅的小蝌蚪 · 我校伍楷舜教授当选2023年IEEE Fellow - Research Department

1 年前

坚强的伤痕 · 特稿：新征程领路人习近平_深圳新闻网

2 年前