Collectives™ on Stack Overflow
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Learn more about Collectives
Teams
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Learn more about Teams
I am trying to setup DynamoDB locally with Spring Boot. Initially I got the setup working and was able to write/save to DynamoDB via a repository. From that point I added more classes to build my application. Now when I try to start my application, I get the following exception:
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionOverrideException: Invalid bean definition with name 'agentRepository' defined in null: Cannot register bean definition [Root bean: class [org.socialsignin.spring.data.dynamodb.repository.support.DynamoDBRepositoryFactoryBean]; scope=; abstract=false; lazyInit=false; autowireMode=0; dependencyCheck=0; autowireCandidate=true; primary=false; factoryBeanName=null; factoryMethodName=null; initMethodName=null; destroyMethodName=null] for bean 'agentRepository': There is already [Root bean: class [org.socialsignin.spring.data.dynamodb.repository.support.DynamoDBRepositoryFactoryBean]; scope=; abstract=false; lazyInit=false; autowireMode=0; dependencyCheck=0; autowireCandidate=true; primary=false; factoryBeanName=null; factoryMethodName=null; initMethodName=null; destroyMethodName=null] bound.
I have searched SO and internet extensively but there were no any useful solution to this. The error message is misleading as well.
My project is of the following hierarchy
ai.test.as
- agent
- business
- intent
- exception
- Agent.java
- AgentDTO.java
- AgentRespository.java
- AgentController.java
- AgentService.java
- AgentServiceImpl.java
- config
- DynamoDBConfig.java
DynamoDBConfig.java
package ai.test.as.config;
import ai.test.as.agent.AgentRepository;
import ai.test.as.agent.intent.template.TemplateRepository;
import com.amazonaws.auth.AWSCredentials;
import com.amazonaws.auth.BasicAWSCredentials;
import com.amazonaws.services.dynamodbv2.AmazonDynamoDB;
import com.amazonaws.services.dynamodbv2.AmazonDynamoDBClient;
import org.socialsignin.spring.data.dynamodb.repository.config.EnableDynamoDBRepositories;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Value;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
@Configuration
@EnableDynamoDBRepositories(basePackageClasses = {AgentRepository.class})
public class DynamoDBConfig
@Value("${aws.dynamodb.endpoint}")
private String dynamoDBEndpoint;
@Value("${aws.auth.accesskey}")
private String awsAccessKey;
@Value("${aws.auth.secretkey}")
private String awsSecretKey;
@Bean
public AmazonDynamoDB amazonDynamoDB()
AmazonDynamoDB dynamoDB = new AmazonDynamoDBClient(getAwsCredentials());
dynamoDB.setEndpoint(dynamoDBEndpoint);
return dynamoDB;
@Bean
public AWSCredentials getAwsCredentials()
return new BasicAWSCredentials(awsAccessKey, awsSecretKey);
AgentRepository.java
package ai.test.as.agent;
import ai.test.as.agent.Agent;
import org.socialsignin.spring.data.dynamodb.repository.EnableScan;
import org.springframework.data.repository.CrudRepository;
@EnableScan
public interface AgentRepository extends CrudRepository<Agent, String>
AgentController.java (Where AgentRepository is used)
@RestController
@RequestMapping(value = "/v1/agents")
public class AgentController
@Autowired
private AgentRepository agentRepository;
@RequestMapping(value = "/test", method = RequestMethod.POST)
public void test()
Agent agent = new Agent();
agent.setAgentNumber("123456");
agent.setId(1);
agentRepository.save(agent);
Spring suggests the following:
> The bean 'agentRepository', defined in null, could not be registered. A bean with that name has already been defined in null and overriding is disabled.
What does null mean here? Is it because something wrong in my application config? Also how is it possible that it is already registered?
Please give me some pointers because I so confused about my next steps.
–
–
–
Bean overriding has to be enabled since Spring Boot 2.1,
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/wiki/Spring-Boot-2.1-Release-Notes
Bean Overriding
Bean overriding has been disabled by default to prevent a bean being accidentally overridden. If you are relying on overriding, you will need to set spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding to true.
spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding=true
or yml,
spring:
main:
allow-bean-definition-overriding: true
to enable overriding again.
Edit,
Bean Overriding is based of the name of the bean not its type. e.g.
@Bean
public ClassA class(){
return new ClassA();
@Bean
public ClassB class(){
return new ClassB();
Will cause this error in > 2.1, by default bean names are taken from the method name. Renaming the method or adding the name attribute to the Bean annotation will be a valid fix.
–
–
–
–
–
Enable bean overriding with such approach for example
@SpringBootTest(properties = "spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding=true")
@SpringBootApplication (properties = "spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding=true")
–
–
I think I had the same problem with MongoDB. At least the error message looked exactly the same and I also had just one repository for the MongoDB, something like this:
public interface MyClassMongoRepository extends MongoRepository<MyClass, Long> {
The problem had been caused by class MyClass which had been used in another database before. Spring silently created some JpaRepository before creating the MongoRepository. Both repositories had the same name which caused the conflict.
Solution was to make a copy of MyClass, move it into the package of the MongoRepository and remove any JPA-specific annotations.
–
–
I just stumbled across the same issue while trying to add a PostgreSQL database via spring-data-jdbc to an existing project wich was already using a MongoDB.
It seems like the problem was that the repositories for MongoDB and PostgreSQL were scanned by both modules (spring-mongo and spring-jdbc). They both try to create some beans and clash.
In my case the MongoDB repositories and the PostgreSQL repositories were in the same package.
The accepted answer solved the problem for me -
but i kind of got a hint from this startup logs:
Finished Spring Data repository scanning in 319ms. Found 4 repository interfaces
Finished Spring Data repository scanning in 319ms. Found 5 repository interfaces
This is weird because i only have 1 repository for PostgreSQL and 4 for MongoDB.
I moved the PostgreSQL repository into a different package than the MongoDB repository and configured the base package of the PostgreSQL repositories to the new package.
In my case:
@EnableJdbcRepositories(basePackageClasses = MyOnlyPostgreSQLRepository.class) // TODO: Use the real package or a dedicated base class
This solved the issue for me (no property set for bean overriding - which i prefer). The startups logs also show the correct amount of repositories now (1 and 4).
–
I came across this same issue, the problem was that multiple repository factories were trying to register all repositories interfaces with them. In my case, it was JpaRepositoryFactoryBean & DynamoDBRepositoryFactoryBean. As mentioned in other answers, you could see that on the logs indicated by:
[INFO] Bootstrapping Spring Data DynamoDB repositories in DEFAULT mode.
[INFO] Finished Spring Data repository scanning in 64ms. Found 2 DynamoDB repository interfaces.
[INFO] Bootstrapping Spring Data JPA repositories in DEFAULT mode.
Solution is:
Make sure you are using compatible versions of spring-data-dynamodb / spring-boot / spring-data by checking the compatibility matrix
Make sure each repository is created only once. In my case, I had to add
@SpringBootApplication
@EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude = {
DataSourceAutoConfiguration.class,
DataSourceTransactionManagerAutoConfiguration.class,
HibernateJpaAutoConfiguration.class})
The config may differ in different versions and depending on how many repositories you have in your application. It may be helpful to read about Multi-Repository-configuration
you can use
spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding=true in application.properties file
use @SpringBootApplication (properties = "spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding=true")
This error message is indicating that you have multiple bean definitions with the same name defined in your application. In Spring framework, each bean must have a unique name within the application context.
To resolve this issue, you should rename one of the classes or its bean definition, so that each bean definition has a unique name. You can do this by using the "name" attribute in the @Component, @Repository, or @Service annotations.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
