相关文章推荐
有情有义的帽子  ·  uniapp uni.uploadFile ...·  8 月前    · 
愉快的匕首  ·  linux - Install ...·  10 月前    · 
气宇轩昂的便当  ·  神奇的SQL → 为什么GROUP ...·  10 月前    · 
豪爽的针织衫  ·  django生成测试报告 发送邮件-掘金·  1 年前    · 
Code  ›  Diagnostic Technology for Spine Pathology - PMC
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9633243/
淡定的鸡蛋
1 年前
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer
Asian Spine J. 2022 Oct; 16(5): 764–775.
Published online 2022 Oct 21. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0374
PMCID: PMC9633243
PMID: 36266250

Diagnostic Technology for Spine Pathology

Gang-Un Kim , Wook Tae Park , Min Cheol Chang , and Gun Woo Lee

Gang-Un Kim

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea

Find articles by Gang-Un Kim

Wook Tae Park

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea

Find articles by Wook Tae Park

Min Cheol Chang

3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea

Find articles by Min Cheol Chang

Gun Woo Lee

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea

2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
Author Contributions

Conceptualization: GWL; data curation: GUK, GWL; formal analysis: GWL; funding acquisition: GWL; methodology: GUK, GWL; project administration: GWL; visualization: WTP, MCC; writing–original draft: GUK, WTP, MCC, GWL; and writing–review & editing: GWL.

References

1. Kim GU, Chang MC, Kim TU, Lee GW. Diagnostic modality in spine disease: a review. Asian Spine J. 2020; 14 :910–20. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
2. Bhattacharyya KB. Godfrey Newbold Hounsfield (1919-2004): the man who revolutionized neuroimaging. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016; 19 :448–50. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
3. Young IR. Significant events in the development of MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20 :183–6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
4. Kazamel M, Warren PP. History of electromyography and nerve conduction studies: a tribute to the founding fathers. J Clin Neurosci. 2017; 43 :54–60. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
5. Dewing SB. Modern radiology in historical perspective. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas;; 1962. [ Google Scholar ]
6. Choi BW, Choi MS, Chang H. Radiological assessment of the effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on distraction of the posterior ligamentum flavum in patients with degenerative cervical spines. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021; 13 :499–504. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
7. Moon MS, Choi WR, Lim HG, Lee SY, Wi SM. Pavlov’s ratio of the cervical spine in a Korean population: a comparative study by age in patients with minor trauma without neurologic symptoms. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021; 13 :71–5. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
8. Leone A, Guglielmi G, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Bonomo L. Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review. Radiology. 2007; 245 :62–77. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
9. Yao G, Cheung JP, Shigematsu H, et al. Characterization and predictive value of segmental curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42 :1622–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
10. Wood KB, Popp CA, Transfeldt EE, Geissele AE. Radiographic evaluation of instability in spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19 :1697–703. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
11. Matsuyama Y. Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: conceptual approach and surgical strategy. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017; 1 :56–60. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
12. Roussouly P, Nnadi C. Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19 :1824–36. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
13. Moon MS, Choi WR, Lim HG, Jeon SM, Yu CG. Effect of congenital C4-5 synostosis on adjacent mobile segments: radiographic assessment. Asian Spine J. 2021; 15 :139–42. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
14. Kawasaki S, Shigematsu H, Tanaka M, et al. Segmental flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessed using the fulcrum-bending radiography method. Clin Spine Surg. 2020; 33 :E376–80. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
15. Mishra N, Ramlan A, Tang KH, et al. A novel technique to achieve maximal bending in flexibility assessment by slot-scanning digital radiography in scoliosis: the new gold standard? Eur J Radiol. 2021; 141 :109805. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
16. Cheung JP, Fong HK, Cheung PW. Predicting spondylolisthesis correction with prone traction radiographs. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B :1062–71. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
17. Luan FJ, Zhang J, Mak KC, Liu ZH, Wang HQ. Low radiation X-rays: benefiting people globally by reducing cancer risks. Int J Med Sci. 2021; 18 :73–80. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
18. Matzon JL, Lutsky KF, Ricci EK, Beredjiklian PK. Considerations in the radiologic evaluation of the pregnant orthopaedic patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23 :485–91. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
19. Jahnke RW, Hart BL. Cervical stenosis, spondylosis, and herniated disc disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 1991; 29 :777–91. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
20. Landman JA, Hoffman JC, Jr, Braun IF, Barrow DL. Value of computed tomographic myelography in the recognition of cervical herniated disk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1984; 5 :391–4. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
21. Simon JE, Lukin RR. Diskogenic disease of the cervical spine. Semin Roentgenol. 1988; 23 :118–24. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
22. Chawla S. Multidetector computed tomography imaging of the spine. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004; 28 Suppl 1 :S28–31. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
23. Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ. Helical CT in the primary trauma evaluation of the cervical spine: an evidence-based approach. Skeletal Radiol. 2000; 29 :632–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
24. Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005; 58 :902–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
25. Lee HJ, Choi DY, Shin MH, Kim JT, Kim IS, Hong JT. Anatomical feasibility for safe occipital condyle screw fixation. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25 :1674–82. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
26. Newton PO, Hahn GW, Fricka KB, Wenger DR. Utility of three-dimensional and multiplanar reformatted computed tomography for evaluation of pediatric congenital spine abnormalities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27 :844–50. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
27. Firooznia H, Rafii M, Golimbu C, Tyler I, Benjamin VM, Pinto RS. Computed tomography of calcification and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. J Comput Tomogr. 1984; 8 :317–24. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
28. Izumi T, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Sano A, Ito T, Endo N. Three-dimensional evaluation of volume change in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine using computed tomography. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22 :2569–74. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
29. Nishimura S, Nagoshi N, Iwanami A, et al. Prevalence and distribution of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis on whole-spine computed tomography in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a multicenter study. Clin Spine Surg. 2018; 31 :E460–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
30. Ghodasara N, Yi PH, Clark K, Fishman EK, Farshad M, Fritz J. Postoperative spinal CT: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2019; 39 :1840–61. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
31. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167 :700–7. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
32. Yeom JS, Chung MS, Lee CK, Kim Y, Kim N, Lee JB. Evaluation of pedicle screw position on computerized tomography scans: technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98 (1 Suppl):104–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
33. Wellenberg RH, Hakvoort ET, Slump CH, Boomsma MF, Maas M, Streekstra GJ. Metal artifact reduction techniques in musculoskeletal CT-imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2018; 107 :60–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
34. Hartley KG, Damon BM, Patterson GT, Long JH, Holt GE. MRI techniques: a review and update for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012; 20 :775–87. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
35. Hansen BB. Introducing standing weight-bearing MRI in the diagnostics of low back pain and degenerative spinal disorders. Dan Med J. 2017; 64 :B5416. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
36. Berger A. Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ. 2002; 324 :35. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
37. Edelman RR. The history of MR imaging as seen through the pages of radiology. Radiology. 2014; 273 (2 Suppl):S181–200. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
38. Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Thomas B, Shroff MM, Haacke EM. Principles, techniques, and applications of T2*-based MR imaging and its special applications. Radiographics. 2009; 29 :1433–49. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
39. Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G, Rousseau J, Marchandise X, Cotten A. Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics. 1999; 19 :373–82. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
40. Alyas F, Saifuddin A, Connell D. MR imaging evaluation of the bone marrow and marrow infiltrative disorders of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007; 15 :199–219. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
41. Rubin JB, Enzmann DR, Wright A. CSF-gated MR imaging of the spine: theory and clinical implementation. Radiology. 1987; 163 :784–92. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
42. Taber KH, Herrick RC, Weathers SW, Kumar AJ, Schomer DF, Hayman LA. Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine. Radiographics. 1998; 18 :1499–521. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
43. Modic MT, Feiglin DH, Piraino DW, et al. Vertebral osteomyelitis: assessment using MR. Radiology. 1985; 157 :157–66. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
44. Haughton V, Schreibman K, De Smet A. Contrast between scar and recurrent herniated disk on contrastenhanced MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23 :1652–6. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
45. Bradley WG, Jr, Waluch V, Yadley RA, Wycoff RR. Comparison of CT and MR in 400 patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord. Radiology. 1984; 152 :695–702. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
46. Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology. 2004; 230 :583–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
47. Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40 :1033–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
48. Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194 :1095–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
49. Park HJ, Kim JH, Lee JW, et al. Clinical correlation of a new and practical magnetic resonance grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis assessment. Acta Radiol. 2015; 56 :727–32. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
50. Kaniewska M, de Beus JM, Ahlhelm F, et al. Whole spine localizers of magnetic resonance imaging detect unexpected vertebral fractures. Acta Radiol. 2019; 60 :742–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
51. Wang B, Fintelmann FJ, Kamath RS, Kattapuram SV, Rosenthal DI. Limited magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine has high sensitivity for detection of acute fractures, infection, and malignancy. Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45 :1687–93. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
52. Williams RL, Hardman JA, Lyons K. MR imaging of suspected acute spinal instability. Injury. 1998; 29 :109–13. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
53. Ricart PA, Verma R, Fineberg SJ, et al. Post-traumatic cervical spine epidural hematoma: incidence and risk factors. Injury. 2017; 48 :2529–33. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
54. Kumar Y, Hayashi D. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in acute spinal trauma: a pictorial review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17 :310. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
55. Tan J, Shen L, Fang L, et al. Correlations between posterior longitudinal injury and parameters of vertebral body damage. J Surg Res. 2015; 199 :552–6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
56. Henninger B, Kaser V, Ostermann S, et al. Cervical disc and ligamentous injury in hyperextension trauma: MRI and intraoperative correlation. J Neuroimaging. 2020; 30 :104–9. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
57. DeSanto J, Ross JS. Spine infection/inflammation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011; 49 :105–27. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
58. Cadiou S, Robin F, Guillin R, et al. Spondyloarthritis and sarcoidosis: related or fake friends?: a systematic literature review. Joint Bone Spine. 2020; 87 :579–87. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
59. Philpott C, Brotchie P. Comparison of MRI sequences for evaluation of multiple sclerosis of the cervical spinal cord at 3 T. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 80 :780–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
60. Chen CJ, Hsu HL, Niu CC, et al. Cervical degenerative disease at flexion-extension MR imaging: prediction criteria. Radiology. 2003; 227 :136–42. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
61. Guppy KH, Hawk M, Chakrabarti I, Banerjee A. The use of flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating signal intensity changes of the cervical spinal cord. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009; 10 :366–73. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
62. Harada T, Tsuji Y, Mikami Y, et al. The clinical usefulness of preoperative dynamic MRI to select decompression levels for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 28 :820–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
63. Zhang L, Zeitoun D, Rangel A, Lazennec JY, Catonne Y, Pascal-Moussellard H. Preoperative evaluation of the cervical spondylotic myelopathy with flexionextension magnetic resonance imaging: about a prospective study of fifty patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36 :E1134–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
64. Hansson T, Suzuki N, Hebelka H, Gaulitz A. The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18 :679–86. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
65. Weishaupt D, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, et al. Positional MR imaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible at conventional MR imaging? Radiology. 2000; 215 :247–53. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
66. Mataki K, Koda M, Shibao Y, et al. Successful visualization of dynamic change of lumbar nerve root compression with the patient in both upright and prone positions using dynamic digital tomosynthesis-radiculography in patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis: an initial report of three cases. J Clin Neurosci. 2019; 62 :256–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
67. Lee RK, Griffith JF, Lau YY, et al. Diagnostic capability of low- versus high-field magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar degenerative disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40 :382–91. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
68. Tarantino U, Fanucci E, Iundusi R, et al. Lumbar spine MRI in upright position for diagnosing acute and chronic low back pain: statistical analysis of morphological changes. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013; 14 :15–22. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
69. Alyas F, Connell D, Saifuddin A. Upright positional MRI of the lumbar spine. Clin Radiol. 2008; 63 :1035–48. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
70. Gilbert JW, Wheeler GR, Lingreen RA, Johnson RR. Open stand-up MRI: a new instrument for positional neuroimaging. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006; 19 :151–4. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
71. Florkow MC, Willemsen K, Mascarenhas VV, Oei EH, van Stralen M, Seevinck PR. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for three-dimensional bone imaging of musculoskeletal pathologies: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022; 56 :11–34. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
72. Du J, Carl M, Bydder M, Takahashi A, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone. J Magn Reson. 2010; 207 :304–11. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
73. Bae WC, Chen PC, Chung CB, Masuda K, D’Lima D, Du J. Quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI of human cortical bone: correlation with porosity and biomechanical properties. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27 :848–57. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
74. Rudisch A, Kremser C, Peer S, Kathrein A, Judmaier W, Daniaux H. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion: a comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23 :692–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
75. Raj V, O’Dwyer R, Pathmanathan R, Vaidhyanath R. MRI and cardiac pacing devices: beware the rules are changing. Br J Radiol. 2011; 84 :857–9. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
76. Xiong L, Zeng QY, Jinkins JR. CT and MRI characteristics of ossification of the ligamenta flava in the thoracic spine. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11 :1798–802. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
77. Haldorsen IS, Lura N, Blaakær J, Fischerova D, Werner HM. What is the role of imaging at primary diagnostic work-up in uterine cervical cancer? Curr Oncol Rep. 2019; 21 :77. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
78. Kang KW, Kim SE, Lee DS, Jung JK. Koh’s nuclear medicine. 4th ed. Seoul: Korea Medicine;; 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
79. O’Malley JP, Ziessman HA, Thrall JH. Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging: the requisites. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
80. Zhao QM, Gu XF, Liu ZT, Cheng L. The value of radionuclide bone imaging in defining fresh fractures among osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2016; 27 :745–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
81. Jordan E, Choe D, Miller T, Chamarthy M, Brook A, Freeman LM. Utility of bone scintigraphy to determine the appropriate vertebral augmentation levels. Clin Nucl Med. 2010; 35 :687–91. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
82. Jun DS, An BK, Yu CH, Hwang KH, Paik JW. Practical use of bone scan in patients with an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30 :194–8. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
83. Minoves Font M. Clinical applications of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis and assessment of musculoskeletal sports injuries. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed) 2020; 39 :112–34. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
84. Love C, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine imaging of bone infections. Clin Radiol. 2016; 71 :632–46. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
85. Gosfield E, 3rd, Alavi A, Kneeland B. Comparison of radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting spinal metastases. J Nucl Med. 1993; 34 :2191–8. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
86. Costelloe CM, Rohren EM, Madewell JE, et al. Imaging bone metastases in breast cancer: techniques and recommendations for diagnosis. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10 :606–14. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
87. Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22 :2942–53. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
88. Blake GM, Park-Holohan SJ, Cook GJ, Fogelman I. Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. Semin Nucl Med. 2001; 31 :28–49. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
89. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Miyazaki T, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of osteosclerotic and osteolytic vertebral metastatic lesions: comparison with bone scintigraphy. Asian Spine J. 2013; 7 :96–103. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
90. Liu T, Cheng T, Xu W, Yan WL, Liu J, Yang HL. A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40 :523–31. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
91. Park SM, Park JW, Lee HJ, et al. Diagnostic value of Technetium-99m bone scintigraphy in the detection of cervical spine metastases in oncological patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42 :1699–705. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
92. Gheita TA, Azkalany GS, Kenawy SA, Kandeel AA. Bone scintigraphy in axial seronegative spondyloarthritis patients: role in detection of subclinical peripheral arthritis and disease activity. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015; 18 :553–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
93. Horger M, Bares R. The role of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in benign and malignant bone disease. Semin Nucl Med. 2006; 36 :286–94. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
94. Linke R, Kuwert T, Uder M, Forst R, Wuest W. Skeletal SPECT/CT of the peripheral extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194 :W329–35. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
95. Horger M, Eschmann SM, Pfannenberg C, et al. Evaluation of combined transmission and emission tomography for classification of skeletal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183 :655–61. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
96. Gnanasegaran G, Paycha F, Strobel K, et al. Bone SPECT/CT in postoperative spine. Semin Nucl Med. 2018; 48 :410–24. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
97. Al-Riyami K, Voo S, Gnanasegaran G, et al. The role of bone SPECT/CT in patients with persistent or recurrent lumbar pain following lumbar spine stabilization surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 46 :989–98. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
98. Brusko GD, Perez-Roman RJ, Tapamo H, Burks SS, Serafini AN, Wang MY. Preoperative SPECT imaging as a tool for surgical planning in patients with axial neck and back pain. Neurosurg Focus. 2019; 47 :E19. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
99. Tender GC, Davidson C, Shields J, et al. Primary pain generator identification by CT-SPECT in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Neurosurg Focus. 2019; 47 :E18. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
100. Anderson K, Sarwark JF, Conway JJ, Logue ES, Schafer MF. Quantitative assessment with SPECT imaging of stress injuries of the pars interarticularis and response to bracing. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000; 20 :28–33. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
101. Perez-Roman RJ, Brusko GD, Burks SS, Serafini AN, Wang MY. Use of single-photon emission computed tomography imaging for hypermetabolic facet identification in diagnosis of cervical and axial back pain. World Neurosurg. 2020; 137 :e487–92. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
102. Ryan RJ, Gibson T, Fogelman I. The identification of spinal pathology in chronic low back pain using single photon emission computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun. 1992; 13 :497–502. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
103. McDonald M, Cooper R, Wang MY. Use of computed tomography-single-photon emission computed tomography fusion for diagnosing painful facet arthropathy: technical note. Neurosurg Focus. 2007; 22 :E2. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
104. Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ. Electrodiagnostic medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Hanley & Belfus; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
105. Lee DG, Chang MC. Dorsal scapular nerve injury after trigger point injection into the rhomboid major muscle: a case report. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018; 31 :211–4. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
106. Kwak SY, Boudier-Reveret M, Chang MC. Watch out for slowly progressive weakness of the distal upper limb: it could be chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathy! Ann Palliat Med. 2020; 9 :1285–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
107. Rubin DI. Needle electromyography: basic concepts. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019; 160 :243–56. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
108. Chang MC. Missed diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in a patient with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurol Int. 2018; 10 :7690. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
109. Kwak S, Boudier-Reveret M, Cho HK, Chang MC. Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy misdiagnosed as carpal tunnel syndrome: a case report. J Int Med Res. 2021; 49 :300060521998896. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Articles from Asian Spine Journal are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
 
推荐文章
有情有义的帽子  ·  uniapp uni.uploadFile filename 没有后缀名 上传的问题 后端是node_uni.uploadfile 使用files 时没有后缀名-CSDN博客
8 月前
愉快的匕首  ·  linux - Install Oracle 12 or 19 Client with ODBC on Ubuntu 18? - Stack Overflow
10 月前
气宇轩昂的便当  ·  神奇的SQL → 为什么GROUP BY之后不能直接引用原表中的列？-PingCAP | 平凯星辰
10 月前
豪爽的针织衫  ·  django生成测试报告 发送邮件-掘金
1 年前
今天看啥   ·   Py中国   ·   codingpro   ·   藏经阁   ·   小百科   ·   link之家   ·   卧龙AI搜索
删除内容请联系邮箱 2879853325@qq.com
Code - 代码工具平台
© 2024 ~ 沪ICP备11025650号