这项研究提出了关于斯坦福－比内特智力量表（第四版）（RL Thorndike，EP Hagen和JM Sattler，1986年）作为个人智力测评的综合标准年龄得分（SAS）有效性的调查结果。智力低下。根据本研究的样本获得的结果，复合SAS似乎无法准确反映许多智障人士的整体智力。具体来说，当四个区域的SAS（口头推理[VR]，抽象/视觉推理[Ab / VR]，定量推理[QR]和短期记忆[STM]）之间存在差异时，复合SAS最接近最低的区域SAS，而不是四个区域SAS的总和。档案数据表明，对于智力低下的人，这一发现是Binet评分的一个一致模式，但对于其他智力水平的人则不是。讨论了此发现的原因和含义。
This study presents results of an investigation into the validity of the Composite Standard Age Score (SAS) of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition, (R. L. Thorndike, E. P. Hagen & J. M. Sattler, 1986) as a measure of intellectual ability for individuals with mental retardation. On the basis of the results obtained with the sample of participants in this study, the Composite SAS does not appear to accurately reflect the overall intellectual abilities of many individuals with mental retardation. Specifically, when there is a discrepancy among the SASs of the four Areas (Verbal Reasoning [VR], Abstract/Visual Reasoning [Ab/VR], Quantitative Reasoning [QR], and Short-Term Memory [STM]),the Composite SAS is closest to the lowest Area SAS instead of an aggregate of the four Area SASs. Archival data demonstrated that this finding is a consistent pattern in the Binet scores for individuals with mental retardation but not for individuals of other intellectual levels. The reasons and the implications for this finding are discussed.
