Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Learn more about Collectives

Teams

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Learn more about Teams
var myvar = document.getElementById("abc");
abc.value += "test";
abc.value += "another test";

Jquery:

$("#abc").val($("#abc").val()+"test");
$("#abc").val($("#abc").val()+"another test");

Is there a way to make my Jquery prettier, maybe with a hidden += function that I could use? I know that .val() is not an attribute, but I feel there must be a way to make this code more beautiful to look at...

Something like this would be great:

 $("#abc").valueAttribute += "test"
 $("#abc").val().content += "test"
 $("#abc").val().add("test")
                Be careful with any solution that uses .value (including the first part of my answer). It will only work for <input> elements. You may end up pulling your hair out one day if abc becomes a <textarea>.
– Patrick McElhaney
                Aug 3, 2009 at 19:50
                I wish Stack Overflow had a feature where the author of an old accepted answer could propose moving the check mark to a newer answer. In this case, Felix's answer is better.
– Patrick McElhaney
                Jul 23, 2015 at 17:06
 $.fn.appendVal = function (newPart) {
   return this.each(function(){ $(this).val( $(this).val() + newPart); });
 $("#abc").appendVal("test");
                Plugin is nice solution, but shouldn't it do return this.each(function(){ $(this).val( $(this).val + newPart); }); --- preserve chain ability and apply to multiple elements if needed?
– gnarf
                Aug 3, 2009 at 19:56
                one last comment on the plugin... return this.each instead of $(this).each - "this" will be a jquery object already - no need to pass it through the jquery function again.
– gnarf
                Aug 3, 2009 at 20:34

Since jQuery 1.4, it is possible to pass a function to .val() which gets the current value as second argument:

$("#abc").val(function(i, val) {
    return val + "test";

I've never come across anything like that, doesn't mean it doesn't exist though.

I usually just store val() in a temporary variable and do the manipulation on that, then call val(temp) in a separate line. It spreads the operation out to three or more lines, but it's still more readable than .val(.val() + ""), IMO. It also scales better than +=, if you have a more complicated expression to do to the value.

var temp = $(".abc").val();
temp += "test";
$(".abc").val(temp);
                True, it would look better. I don't worry about scalling since it's a pretty simple function and there is no reason for it to evolve too much.
– marcgg
                Aug 3, 2009 at 19:27

$() returns a selection; it doesn't return the actual resulting object (although in practice, it simply returns a list of the actual objects). If you want to mutate the object's .value property, you can do this:

$('.abc').each(function(){ this.value += foo; });

If you like, you can create functions that operate on selections, such as .add(), which could be implemented like this:

jQuery.fn.extend({ add: function(k,v) { this[k](this[k]()+v); } });

which can then be used like this:

$('.abc').add('val', foo);

...but I don't think this is any better than using $().each()

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> <title>Untitled Document</title> <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.3.2.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> (function($){ $.fn.valInc = function(vadd) var val = $(this).val() + '' + vadd; $(this).val(val); })(jQuery); $(function(){ $("#tst").valInc('test 2'); </script> </head> <input id='tst' value="test" /> </body> </html>

Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid

  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.