The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before
sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal
government site.
The
https://
ensures that you are connecting to the
official website and that any information you provide is encrypted
and transmitted securely.
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more about our disclaimer.
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi.
2020 Nov 5; 34(11): 1045–1048.
Language:
Chinese
|
English
常用的婴幼儿听觉功能评估工具
Common tools of auditory function assessment in infants and toddlers
1
and
1,
Δ
*
杨 奉玲
四川大学华西医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 听力及言语康复实验室(成都，610041)
郑 芸
四川大学华西医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 听力及言语康复实验室(成都，610041)
四川大学华西医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 听力及言语康复实验室(成都，610041)
王丽燕等(2015)比较了LEAQ和ITMAIS的听能评估差异，结果显示，佩戴助听设备前后，2份量表的得分相关性较好，但干预后ITMAIS得分与ITMAIS常模有一定差距，而LEAQ评估时，与常模的差距很小。笔者认为，这种差异可能是由2个量表的条目数量不等、计分方式、评估方法不同及评估维度不同所导致。诚然，相较于LEAQ、MAIS/ITMAIS包含的条目更少，且在评估过程中，需要评分者对家长反馈的信息进行等级评分，这对评分者要求更高，所以不同评分者的水平是否会影响评测结果，如何避免这种影响，都是后续研究值得探讨的。
综上，该文总结了常用的婴幼儿听功能评估工具的一般情况、心理学测量学特征及应用概况。很明显，一项评估工具能否评估听功能，与工具自身的稳定性、准确性等心理测量学特质密不可分，所以，临床工作者有必要明确所使用的评估工具的性能及应用范围，以更好地评估婴幼儿的听觉功能。
References
1.
孙 喜斌. 0~3岁听力障碍儿童听觉言语康复及效果评估
中国听力语言康复科学杂志
2016;
14
(3):161–165. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2016.03.001.
[
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
2.
Weichbold V, Anderson I, D' Haese P. Validation of three adaptations of the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale(MAIS)to German, English and Polish.
Int J Audiol.
2004;
43
(3):156–161. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050021.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
3.
Barker BA, Donovan NJ, Schubert AD, et al. Using Rasch analysis to examine the item-level psychometrics of the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scales.
Speech Lang Hear.
2017;
20
(3):130–143. doi: 10.1080/2050571X.2016.1243747.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
4.
Zheng Y, Soli SD, Wang K, et al. A normative study of early prelingual auditory development.
Audiol Neuro-Otol.
2009;
14
(4):214–222. doi: 10.1159/000189264.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
5.
Zhong Y, Xu T, Dong R, et al. The analysis of reliability and validity of the IT-MAIS, MAIS and MUSS.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2017;
96
:106–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.03.006.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
6.
Wang NY, Eisenberg LS, Johnson KC, et al. Tracking development of speech recognition: longitudinal data from hierarchical assessments in the Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation Study.
Otol Neurotol.
2008;
29
(2):240–245. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181627a37.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
7.
Zheng Y, Soli SD, Tao Y, et al. Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2011;
75
(11):1418–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.08.005.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
8.
Zheng Y, Li G, Meng ZL, et al. Outcome assessment alternatives for young children during the first 12 months after pediatric hearing-aid fittings.
Int J Audiol.
2012;
51
(11):846–855. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.711914.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
9.
李 刚, 郑 芸, 孟 照莉, et al. 婴幼儿有意义听觉整合量表评估极重度聋幼儿助听后早期语前听能发育的价值
听力学及言语疾病杂志
2017;
25
(5):517–520. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.05.018.
[
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
10.
Bruijnzeel H, Ziylan F, Stegeman I, et al. A Systematic Review to Define the Speech and Language Benefit of Early(<12 Months)Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.
Audiol Neurootol.
2016;
21
(2):113–126. doi: 10.1159/000443363.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
11.
Lu X, Qin Z. Auditory and language development in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2018;
107
:183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.006.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
12.
Liang S, Soli SD, Zheng Y, et al. Initial classification of pediatric hearing impairment using behavioral measures of early prelingual auditory development.
Int J Audiol.
2016;
55
(4):224–231. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1120891.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
13.
Coninx F, Weichbold V, Tsiakpini L, et al. Validation of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire in children with normal hearing.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2009;
73
(12):1761–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.036.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
14.
王 丽燕, 梁 巍, 陈 军兰, et al. 中文版《小龄儿童听觉发展问卷》的有效性研究
中国听力语言康复科学杂志
2011;
2
(1):43–46.
[
Google Scholar
]
15.
Wang L, Sun X, Liang W, et al. Validation of the Mandarin version of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2013;
77
(8):1350–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.05.033.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
16.
Geal-Dor M, Jbarah R, Meilijson S, et al. The Hebrew and the Arabic version of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire for the assessment of auditory development: Results in normal hearing children and children with cochlear implants.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2011;
75
(10):1327–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.030.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
17.
Kosaner J, Sonuguler S, Olgun L, et al. Young cochlear implant users' auditory development as measured and monitored by the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire: a Turkish experience.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2013;
77
(8):1359–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.05.036.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
18.
Obrycka A, Lorens A, Padilla Garcia JL, et al. Validation of the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire in cochlear implanted infants and toddlers.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2017;
93
:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.12.024.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
19.
May-Mederake B, Kuehn H, Vogel A, et al. Evaluation of auditory development in infants and toddlers who received cochlear implants under the age of 24 months with the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2010;
74
(10):1149–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.003.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
20.
McCreery RW, Walker EA, Spratford M, et al. Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
Ear Hear.
2015;
36 Suppl 1
:60s–75s.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
21.
Liu H, Jin X, Li J, et al. Early auditory preverbal skills development in Mandarin speaking children with cochlear implants.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2015;
79
(1):71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.11.010.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
22.
原 皞, 张 华, 梁 巍, et al. 影响人工耳蜗植入的婴幼儿听觉能力的外在因素追踪研究
临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
2015;
29
(19):1671–1676.
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
23.
Ching TY, Hill M. The Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children(PEACH)Scale: Normative Data.
J Am Acad Audiol.
2007;
18
(3):220–235. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.3.4.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
24.
Levy CC, Rodrigues-Sato LC. Questionnaire validation-PEACH on Brazilian Portuguese.
Codas.
2016;
28
(3):205–211. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162013038.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
25.
Quar TK, Ching TY, Mukari SZ, et al. Parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children(PEACH)scale in the Malay language: data for normal-hearing children.
Int J Audiol.
2012;
51
(4):326–333. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.637079.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
26.
伍 丽东, 李 健鸿, 黄 妍. 家长/教师助听器效果评估问卷在听障儿童助听器验配中的应用
中国听力语言康复科学杂志
2009;
7
(5):25–29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2009.05.005.
[
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
27.
Bagatto MP, Scollie SD. Validation of the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children(PEACH)Rating Scale.
J Am Acad Audiol.
2013;
24
(2):121–125. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.5.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
28.
Bagatto MP, Moodie ST, Malandrino AC, et al. The University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol(UWO PedAMP)
Trends Amplif.
2011;
15
(1):57–76. doi: 10.1177/1084713811420304.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
29.
Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DH. Categories of Auditory Performance.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.
1995;
166
:312–314.
[
PubMed
]
[
Google Scholar
]
30.
Archbold S, Lutman ME, Nikolopoulos T. Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability.
Br J Audiol.
1998;
32
(1):7–11. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000045.
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
31.
王 大华, 周 慧芳, 张 静. 中文版听觉行为分级对语前聋儿童人工耳蜗植入术后汉语听觉行为评估的研究
临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
2015;
29
(5):441–445.
[
Google Scholar
]
32.
孙 喜斌, 刘 巧云, 黄 昭鸣, et al.
听觉功能评估的标准与方法.
上海: 华东师范大学出版社; 2008. pp. 39–41.
[
Google Scholar
]
33.
Bagatto MP, Moodie ST, Seewald RC, et al. A Critical Review of Audiological Outcome Measures for Infants and Children.
Trends Amplif.
2011;
15
(1):23–33. doi: 10.1177/1084713811412056.
[
PMC free article
]
[
PubMed
] [
CrossRef
]
[
Google Scholar
]
34.
Kishon-Rabin L, Elichai O, Maimon D, et al. Developmental aspects of the IT-MAIS in normal-hearing babies.
Isr J Speech Hear.
2001;
23
(1):12–22.
[
Google Scholar
]
Articles from
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery
are provided here courtesy of
Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
