Collectives™ on Stack Overflow
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Learn more about Collectives
Teams
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Learn more about Teams
Another way this error can occur is when you reload the module with the class in a Jupiter notebook.
Easy solution is to restart the kernel.
http://thomas-cokelaer.info/blog/2011/09/382/
Check out @Mike W's
answer
for more detail.
–
You should call
super
using the
UrlManager
class as first argument not the
URL
model.
super
cannot called be with an
unrelated
class/type:
From the docs,
super(type[, object-or-type])
:
Return a proxy object that delegates method calls to a parent or
sibling class of type.
So you
cannot
do:
>>> class D:
... pass
>>> class C:
... def __init__(self):
... super(D, self).__init__()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 3, in __init__
TypeError: super(type, obj): obj must be an instance or subtype of type
You should do:
qs_main = super(UrlManager, self).all(*args, **kwargs)
Or in Python 3:
qs_main = super().all(*args, **kwargs)
–
–
Elaborating in @Oğuz Şerbetci's answer, in python3 (not necessary only in Jupyter), when there is the need to reload a library, for example we have class Parent
and class Child
defined as
class Parent(object):
def __init__(self):
# do something
class Child(Parent):
def __init__(self):
super(Child, self).__init__(self)
then if you do this
import library.Child
reload(library)
Child()
you will get TypeError: super(type, obj): obj must be an instance or subtype of type
, the solution is just to re import the class after the reload
import library.Child
reload(library)
import library.Child
Child()
–
You can get his issue in because reload
logic have some bugs (issue)
Here is a simple solution/workaround that works for me until issue is not fixed
Add typo like 1001xx
at the bottom of the file which you call in the cell
Run your cell - you will see some exception, just skip it
Remove typo which was added on step 1
Run the cell
Profit
The best solution that I have found for this problem is only available using python 3. You then don't need to specify the arguments of "super", then you won't have the error any more writing your class like this :
class D:
class C(D):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()# no arguments given to super()
Another interesting way is if a merge of branches has duplicated the class, so that in the file you have two definitions for the same name, e.g.
class A(Foo):
def __init__(self):
super(A, self).__init__()
class A(Foo):
def __init__(self):
super(A, self).__init__()
If you try to create an instance from a static reference to the first definition of A, once it tries to call super
, inside the __init__
method, A
will refer to the second definition of A
, since it has been overwritten. The solution - ofcourse - is to remove the duplicate definition of the class, so it doesn't get overwritten.
This may seem like something that would never happen, but it just happened to me, when I wasn't paying close enough attention to the merge of two branches. My tests failed with the error message described in the question, so I thought I'd leave my findings here, even though it doesn't exactly answer the specific question.
This error also pops out when you simply do not instantiate child class
, and try to call a method on a class itself, like in :
class Parent:
def method():
class Child(Parent):
def method():
super().method()
P = Parent()
C = Child
C.method()
–
Similar to @Eldamir, I solved it by realizing I had written two classes with the same name, and the second one was overwriting the first.
If that's the case, change the name of one of the classes.
So I just pasted in a form in forms.py.
I just made a fast look to see if I needed to change anything, but I didn't see that.
Then I got this super(type, obj): obj must be an instance or subtype of type error, so I searched for it on the browser, but before I checked any of the answers I looked one more time and this time I spotted the issue.
As you can see, many answers on this question says it was wrong with the super
. Yes it was the same issue for me.
make sure that you look if you have any super
and see if the class added matches with the class. At least that's what I did.
Before and After
Where I spotted it in my code
forms.py
Before:
class userProfileForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = user_profile
fields = ("user", "rating", )
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/6866387/15188026
hide_condition = kwargs.pop('hide_condition',None)
super(ProfileForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
if hide_condition:
self.fields['user'].widget = HiddenInput()
After:
class userProfileForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = user_profile
fields = ("user", "rating", )
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/6866387/15188026
hide_condition = kwargs.pop('hide_condition',None)
super(userProfileForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
if hide_condition:
self.fields['user'].widget = HiddenInput()
You see that the super got changed to the class name
# define forward pass
The class name should match the written class inside the super function. In this case, A_net is the class.
It works for me.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.